On the Edge of Forever
WDP Bliss’s “one institution at a time” strategy for socialist takeover applied to the socialists’ desire for population control
The WDP Bliss Strategy at the Smallest Instance on the Greatest Possible Scale
Some of the earlier socialists claimed that the only solution to human society was to destroy it and to rebuild it all from scratch—you know, unburdened from what has been.
Then WDP Bliss came along in the latter 1800s and said, “That won’t ever work because you don’t have enough force to do that. And you can’t take over from the top down through politics because a socialist party will always be dominated by the existing largest parties and because the United States is made up of many different private institutions that are not controlled by the government. So in order to take over the United States, you need to do it by taking over one American institution at a time. And you don’t do that through a frontal assault, a hostile takeover. You do it by becoming part of that institution and then working your way up through the institutional hierarchy to the point that you are able redefine the institution’s goals according to socialist principles. Then you will have taken over America.”
That was the new American twist to socialism.
The German version wanted to control all economic activity one guild at a time and use the government to do it.
The French version wanted to remake society by using government power to institute terror directed at both individuals and the existing institutions of religion, business, and the monarchy and the aristocracy. But the French version had its own twist: a notion of an original nature that had been corrupted or subverted by the existing order.
Now think of the wide variety of socialist groups that claim that human civilization, especially a market-driven technological civilization, not only has corrupted the original good nature of human beings but also threatens the original state of nature itself.
The solution many of them have proposed is to rid the earth of the human menace or at least cut it way, way back to a number (some have mentioned the number of 100 million) that can easily be managed by wise leaders according to the principles of socialism.
How to do that?
There’s the equivalent of burn it all down:
You could hope for an asteroid impact, as some have.
You could hope for a deadly plague to wipe out billions, as some have.
You could identify those members of society you deem to be a threat to the new man of the new society and kill them wholesale by the millions as Stalin, Hitler, Mao, and Pol Pot did.
You could institute worldwide programs of birth control and abortion (that’s taken out over 1.5 billion—and all their descendants—since the 1950s) using fear of an overcrowded, barren, starving planet to facilitate the plan.
But what would the WDP Bliss “one institution at a time” approach look like if applied to this problem in order to avoid all the negative outcomes of planet-wide annihilation, nuclear conflagration, the logistical problems of the Hitler, Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot approach, and widespread damage to real estate that the new order and its manageable 100,000,000 world population will need?
Instead of burning it all down, including the major part of the world population, you do it one at a time and you do it from the inside.
Instead of infiltrating individual institutions by looking like ordinary members or extraordinarily dedicated champions of that institution’s goals, necessitating, of course, positions in the hierarchy over all the subsystems of the institution, you find a way to infiltrate individual human beings by appearing to be extraordinarily dedicated champions of individual human health.
And what you use is something that can simultaneously affect multiple subsystems of that individual human being. You move the fight from without and visible to all (war, chemical or biological warfare, mass executions, sieges and starvation) to a fight from within, largely visible to no one, and the effects not specifically attributable to any pathogen or disease because those effects will be general and multiple. If the effects look like they could be from anything (or from nothing at all), then they can’t easily be pinned on anything.
What could do something like that?
Not a pathogen, because they are usually tissue or organ system specific and have recognizable signs and symptoms (like anthrax or bubonic plague or small pox or polio or HIV or prions).
What you would need is something that could provoke innate immune inflammatory attacks across multiple organ systems.
There would be multiple benefits to this approach:
1. Since organ system function is complementary in order to sustain life, then hitting many at the same time will erode redundancy that helps to sustain life and increase the chances that something coming along by chance, that could ordinarily be survivable, won’t be.
2. Many different people are already significantly screwed up with some sort of illness affecting predominantly one organ system or another, so if you can initiate simultaneous attacks on multiple organ systems, then the chances are vastly increased that the strain on the already impaired organ system will be enough to cause death that will then be attributable to the effect of the victim’s existing disease on that organ system.
3. If there’s inflammatory damage that cannot be attributable to a particular pathogen or condition, then it can be attributed to “autoimmune disease.”
4. If it’s something that will, because it’s hitting multiple organ systems, take out significant numbers of the relatively small numbers of stem cell populations, then ANYTHING downstream that relies on the differentiated cells produced from those stem cells to maintain health will be hit, leading to conditions that can weaken or kill.
Reduce the number of red blood cells or cells of the adaptive immune system or the innate immune system or stem cells that promote wound repair and tissue regeneration in all the different organ systems and then many, many bad things will happen—anemia or opportunistic diseases or organ failure or cancer or premature aging, any of which could lead to or hasten death and be pinned on known diseases.
5. If it’s something that can take out stem cells and affect all health that depends on those cells, then it can also take out precursor cells involved in the overall development of the individual from conception to adulthood. If enough damage is done to those cells, it could result in insufficiently developed organ systems which then would be more easily prone to dysfunction or damage from other diseases, leading to chronic conditions or death, most of which will be attributed either to known diseases affecting those organs or to “autoimmune disease.”
So, what would be the key to coming up with something like this?
That would be the requirement of something that could provoke widespread, indiscriminate inflammatory attacks across multiple organ systems.
Do those organ systems have anything in common capable of being manipulate in such a general way? And if so, how could it be done?
If it’s something inherent in each cell and dependent on what that cell is monitoring internally, then you would need a way to get something into those cells capable of generating an effect large enough to cause those cells signal that something amiss is going on internally that needs to be countered by means external to the cell—that is, by members of the innate immune launching inflammatory attacks.
Inside each cell are monitors that can detect the presence of viral mRNA and viral protein. So, when infected with a virus, the detection of viral mRNA and viral protein is the minimum necessary condition for the cell to signal the innate immune system to launch innate immune inflammatory attacks to destroy those cells and halt viral proliferation.
And since viral infection usually starts in one place and with few viruses, the alert is immediate, local, and relatively restrained. Most of the time, especially after the first exposure and the adaptive immune system is trained, the threat is taken out quickly, many times before anyone even knows he’s been infected.
So, if you can find a way to take advantage of this intracellular monitoring and then trigger it simultaneously in many different organ systems, then you will have a way to initiate widespread inflammatory attacks and at levels capable of causing significant impairment of those organs, perhaps not noticeable under normal conditions, but showing up when those organs are pushed beyond their inflammatory-attack-induced limits.
If this is possible and if you could find a way to introduce it to over 2/3 of the entire human race multiple times and from the age of infancy to the very old, then you would be in this position:
Instead of burning the human race down, you’d be able to burn it out individually by means of repeated inflammatory damage.
So what would you need to do this?
A. You would need a way to introduce cargo into cells without killing them.
B. You would need something that could get into any cell it came into contact with across many organ systems.
C. You would need a cargo that would trigger those intracellular monitors.
So what you would need is a cell transfection reagent with a cargo of viral RNA capable of being translated into viral protein by the cell itself in order to have that minimum necessary condition for the cell to signal to the innate immune system that it is under attack and being used by viruses (the viral mRNA) to replicate (the viral protein).
Good thing we’ve got responsible people in charge to prevent anyone from initiating a “burn down the human race from within, one person at a time” plan.
Oh, crap!
We are already more than three and a half years into that plan. And among the 5.61 billion people who have been persuaded or threatened to undergo this between one and six or more times we have seen (supposedly) inexplicable and significant increases in all-cause mortality just since that began, among both genders, and all ages, and in a manner that is dose-dependent.
But not amongst those who have never let themselves be injected with those products, the viral mRNA products which are the functional equivalent of an indiscriminate, one-gene Covid-19 super-virus.
“Yeah,” the producers say. “But it can’t replicate.”
Answer: Who needs replication when you guys are doing THAT part for it and infecting more people, more times, in more organs simultaneously in their bodies, across a wider age range, and over a shorter period of time than the lowly C19 virus could ever hope to achieve?
And if that weren’t enough, the manufacturers are bringing out new versions and have plans to replace childhood vaccines with mRNA versions whose primary mechanism of action (and effects) are exactly the same.
Inside of the world going out with a bang, it looks like they’re aiming for it (well, those who are deemed unnecessary for our current level of technology) to go out with an inflammatory whimper and at a rate that the bodies can be disposed of without choking up the planet with corpses from some kind of Armageddon bug.
I’d like to be unburdened from democrats, liberals, Marxists, socialists, maoists, communists etc.