Part II of my never ending search for different ways to make the whole Covid, Inc crime drama more intelligible, or perhaps a little less unintelligible.
I thought of having the three principal non-human players offer descriptions of their work:
1. Viral pathogens that have afflicted people since time immemorial,
2. Viral protein vaccines that have been helping people against viral pathogens for well over a century, and
3. Viral RNA products that, in less than two years on the scene, by pretending to be number 2, have afflicted more people in a shorter time by the same primary mechanism of action than probably any other single serious pathogen from number 1 in recorded history.
____________
2. A Viral Protein Vaccine:
We viral protein vaccines are not nearly so complicated in our primary mechanism of action as viruses and the viral mRNA products.
We do NOT, like those guys do, from inside your cells, stimulate an innate immune inflammatory response directed against cells in multiple organ systems simultaneously throughout your body.
Why? Because, unlike those guys, we don’t invade your cells.
And, unlike those guys, we never infect your healthy cells with viral mRNA.
Why? Because, unlike those guys, we don’t have any.
The most we do, unlike either of those guys, is to create the impression that there’s been a viral infection, but that the fight’s already over and there’s just a little bit of battle debris left to clean up.
But it’s a completely accurate impression.
Why?
Because there has been a battle against viruses; it’s just a battle that was safely fought somewhere on foreign shores outside your body. The only thing we viral protein vaccines do is to create an appearance to the contrary.
How so?
We do that by dropping viral body parts off in an unrelated location, namely, inside your extracellular fluid compartment via a shot in the arm.
The reason we can do this is because the viral proteins used to create us come either from viruses grown safely outside of your body, usually in an embryonated chicken egg, or in cell culture, or they’re produced by recombinant means, also safely done outside of your body, in the same way human insulin and some viral proteins for HepB vaccines are produced.
And if we’ve been designed well enough with a sufficient quantity and variety of bits and pieces of viral pathogen coat proteins, then, when we’re introduced into the extracellular fluid compartment in your muscle tissue by hypodermic, that’s all it takes to get the immunological ball rolling.
With viruses and viral mRNA products, none of that happens until after you’ve been infected.
With us, it happens instead of being infected.
The innate immune system, bless its heart, will reliably detect the proteins we bring in as being of pathogen, non-self origin and, like Barney Fife getting all flustered over seeing a broken window, will put out an intruder alert and then do an Aunt Bea to clean up the bits and pieces of viral protein debris while continuing to bitch about it.
But, in our case, when nothing else is found, the bitching stops and you soon feel normal again.
I mean, to the innate immune system, if we look like smoke, then it assumes there must be fire, too. As a result, you may feel a little weird, usually a sore arm, maybe like you’re coming down with something. But you’re not, because there’s nothing there to do that; you’re only feeling the effects of your innate immune system starting to gear up for what it thinks is there, almost in the same way it does when there actually is something there after you’ve suffered a genuine viral invasion. But it’s not the intruder you’re feeling; you’re only feeling the effects of your innate immune system starting to gear up to fight the intruder it thinks is there.
Chills or fever, aches and pains, a sore throat, a runny nose, phlegm, headache, coughing, sneezing, irritability, a loss of appetite. None of that is caused by the virus. It’s all caused by your innate immune system fighting the virus.
In our case, though, nothing more than the presence of those bits and pieces of viral proteins is required to convince the innate immune system that viruses must also be present.
____________
The innate immune system is no Hercule Poirot or Lovejoy, not even a Hettie Wainwright.
It doesn’t start with, “Wait a second, a bunch of viral body parts suddenly appeared here out of nowhere but we looked and found no actual viruses anywhere and WE didn’t kill any viruses recently.”
It can’t reason its way to, “This means that whatever it was is something that took place outside of our jurisdiction and someone’s trying to cover up what went down there by scattering the body parts here.”
And it can’t finally conclude with, “So that means there’s no need to bother the adaptive immune system with this junk because, obviously, the actual source of danger in not this neighborhood. So let’s just dump it and hit the pub.”
Instead, the innate immune system, without any thought at all, carries out the rest of its program by transporting those bits and pieces of viral protein to the adaptive immune system.
This kind of “if, then” rote brainlessness of the innate immune system to see one thing, assume a situation that doesn’t actually exist, but then act as though it does is what allows us, the viral protein vaccines, to initiate something truly protective for the body as a whole.
But it’s also what enables the viral mRNA products to initiate something seriously harmful to the body as a whole.
Here’s how:
As I said earlier and will say several more times before I’m done (think of all the repetition and restatement as informational booster shots, like a technique of molecular pedagogy), the presence of bits and pieces of viral protein is enough to stimulate the innate immune system to conclude—yeah, okay, I know. I’m attributing reasoning to something where none has ever existed in and anthropomorphizing the innate immune system; but, hey, I’m a viral protein vaccine anthropomorphizing myself, so just go with it, okay?
Anyway, simply the appearance of bits and pieces of viral protein is enough to stimulate the innate immune system to act as though viruses had been there, to clean up the debris, and then to proceed to the next step of dispatching its antigen-presenting cells to the adaptive immune system to hand the debris off to the naive T cells and B cells.
And once those antigen-presenting cells get there, the cells of the adaptive immune system are not going to demand proof of chain of custody of viral body parts all the way back to the actual site of their demise or ask for evidence that the viral body parts being presented to them by the agent of the innate immune system had actually been acquired by the innate immune system detecting and then destroying the viruses.
There is no anal bureaucratic surliness of, “Nuh uh. You guys can’t prove you killed these viruses and where you did it? Then we’re not signing off on delivery.”
Just the mere presentation to the naive T and B cells of bits and pieces of non-self protein or any other junk, for that matter, is enough for the adaptive immune system to begin the process of initiating naive B cells to produce as many specific antibodies as there are specific antigens and to initiate naive T cells to “recognize” those antigens, well, that is, to “recognize” specific epitopes ON those antigens.
And that, basically, is it.
So if, sometime later, you ever DO get infected by the actual pathogen, then those specific antibodies and initiated T cells in circulation and in your extracellular fluid compartment, teaming up with your innate immune system, are going to take the pathogens out so quickly that you’ll probably not even know you’d been infected. And then every subsequent encounter with those pathogens down the road merely serves as a natural immune booster.
But this automatic stimulus and response of the innate and adaptive immune system that’s very helpful in our role as viral protein vaccines can be very bad in other situations.
Like when viruses or viral mRNA products send viral mRNA to the ribosomes of the cells they invade.
And those ribosomes are every bit as unthinking and unquestioning as the naive B and T cells.
There is no process by which the ribosomes say, “Uh, yeah, we don’t see a pending order for this shit and, besides, we can tell this is not for a legitimate host protein. This is for an unknown protein from who the hell knows where and if we delay production of our in-house orders to make gigantic shitloads of this stuff it could have unknown but probably bad effects on our whole operation here and then it’ll be our nuts in the grinder, so you just piss right off.”
The only thing someone up at your level needs understand about this process are the steps in this flowchart:
1. Is there viral mRNA? Check. Go to 2.
2. Are there ribosomes present? Yep. Go to 3.
3. Can the viral mRNA get loaded into the ribosome? Without a doubt. Go to 4.
4. WILL the viral mRNA get loaded into the ribosome? You betcha! Go to 5.
5. Will the viral proteins be produced, no matter what? Unfortunately.
No matter what, they’ll be produced in quantities consistent with the mRNA and the number of those mRNA molecules that are present.
No matter what, whatever effects that can follow from that, will follow until they are sufficient to mess up other things and then, no matter what, whatever effects that can follow from that, will follow from that..
There is no means by which the ribosomes can evaluate outcome against ostensible purpose, and say, “Oh, crap! We really screwed up. Hit the kill switch and shut it all down.”
For sure, there are kill switches that are going to be hit and things that are going to be shut down, maybe even you, but all that is going to happen by a rote if/then process based solely on appearances and with predetermined consequences.
And one of the major consequences is what happens when the innate immune system gets tipped off to the presence of viral mRNA and viral protein by cytosolic sensors in the host cells it’s supposed to be protecting.
The mere presence of viral mRNA and viral protein in host cells—where they’re not supposed to be—is the minimum necessary condition to trigger the innate immune system to produce the minimum necessary response to those cues, which is to kill those cells that appear to be in the viral replication phase.
Again, just to drive the point home for those who seem to believe that cellular machinery can figure things out, detect discrepancies with existing plans, and then reason its way to an entirely novel, though conditionally-appropriate conclusion:
There is no process by which the innate immune system, called into action by the cytosolic sensors to attack a cell, can say, after its exterminators have arrived on the scene, “Okay, now wait just a damned minute. We’re supposed to kill any cell containing viral mRNA and viral protein because that means viruses are inside the cell in viral replication phase, and, if they get out, they’re going to make our job protecting other host cells almost impossible. We get that. No problem. But this cell here has only a single viral mRNA gene and a single viral protein, which IS a problem, because although we may not know a whole lot, we do know that in this whole frigging world there is no frigging virus that consists of a single viral gene and a single viral protein. So, until we get clarification on this unusual situation, we’re not going to do a damned thing to knock these cells off as we’d usually do a virally-compromised cell.”
And there’s nothing down there on the cellular level to second guess and say, “Point taken, but there is something compromising this cell that’s acting substantially enough like a virus to warrant you taking it out, so draw down on it and fire!”
For the cell, there’s no reasoning, no checklists, no diagnostic flowcharts.
There are no hostage negotiators, no rehab programs for virally-deranged cells, even if those cells had been doing nothing more than just hanging out on the street corner minding their own business after getting out of a Bible study when they were unexpectedly taken over by other things for other purposes.
The presence of viral mRNA and viral protein in a host cell where they don’t belong is the sole criterion for initiating innate immune attack on that cell.
And that’s how things occur for all biological processes not subject to conscious control.
You run away from a rampaging beast; you have increased oxygen needs; so your heart and breathing rates compensate automatically.
You do not have to think, “Okay, my O2 requirements are now up by, uh, yeah, about 30%, so I’d better start breathing faster and increase my heart rate to get that O2 to my cells. Oh, yeah, and before I forget—it was a tremendously scary shock, so let me shit myself.”
It’s all automatic.
_____________
So How Did Covid Inc so Completely Overlook All That?
In those companies of Covid Inc pretending to make vaccines, whoever it was who thought that the mere presence of viral spike protein would automatically and naturally lead to the eventual production of specific antibodies and activated T cells obviously forgot about all the other things that would just as naturally and just as automatically follow the weird and unnatural changes that THEY made in the conditions, like these:
A. They obviously forgot that their viral mRNA taking over host cell protein synthesis and the resulting appearance of viral protein would ALSO automatically lead to the innate immune system attacking those cells for exactly the same reason the innate immune system attacks cells invaded and infected by viral pathogens such as smallpox, polio, measles, rabies, and the more than 200 respiratory viruses responsible for the common cold and influenza,
B. They obviously forgot that the immunological consequences of such attacks against an artificial viral pathogen would be at least as bad as those against a natural viral pathogen, except for differences due to the number of cells compromised, the unique nature of the tissues and organs involved, and the overall extent of the compromise throughout the whole organism.
And if they didn’t forget about it, then they deliberately ignored it for reasons of their own.
You say you don’t know those reasons?
Well, that’s because they figured it would be better (at least for them) if you didn’t.
_____________
The Reality of Structure and Process Rules ALL
And all of those things that are happening do so because of what is actually going on and how it appears in the context of the way things actually work in that organism, in you.
That stuff doesn’t happen because of how someone says (or believes) it’s supposed to work. It doesn’t happen because of the source of the compromising agent, whether a horseshoe bat, a weird-ass wet market, an offshore Fauci-authorized gain-of-function lab, or a Pfizer-manufactured viral mRNA introduced by means of the off-label use of a cell transfection reagent with a primary mechanism of action that acts just like an indiscriminate, multi-systemic, virus.
And here’s why: as far as those cells and the life processes dependent on them are concerned, the primary matters of importance are the cells being compromised and getting knocked off and the subsequent degree of impairment of the life processes dependent on them, not whatever it was that led to it or however it happened to gain access.
Sure, questions of origins and unique consequences are important, but only to the extent that the dangers posed by the Enemy from the Other Side can be identified and then avoided or mitigated.
And the formulation, by the companies of Covid Inc, of the objectives themselves, as well as their subsequent identification as short-term outcomes of directed investigation and applied science by non-Covid Inc people, only exist at an organizational level far higher than the cell.
We, as the class of viral protein vaccines, were deliberately engineered at that level for at least three purposes:
A. to protect against the destruction of host cells caused by pathogens and by innate immune inflammatory responses attacking both pathogens and pathogen-compromised cells,
B. to ensure that the biological processes that depend on those cells required to sustain life are not disrupted by the destruction of those cells, and
C. to make sure that our means of protecting the overall organism also do not harm the constituent parts of that organism, whether at the cellular, the tissue, the organ, or the systemic level.
These objectives and the means designed to achieve (or to detect) them did not come about through the very slow and wasteful mechanism (from the individual’s point of view) of evolutionary change, whereby if you, as an individual, happen to possess heritable characteristics that enable you to counter a threat, survive, and procreate so that your progeny’s progeny’s progeny, if they manage to reproduce at a significantly higher rate than others of your kind who do not possess those traits, may be able to shift the genetic character of a sufficiently large number of your species to become dominant.
As far as species go, it’s my understanding that humans generally are not content:
A. to leave things up to chance or
B. to dick around for eons before finding out whether something actually worked.
You humans see birds, bees, and bats fly. You want to get off the ground, too. So you learn the principles of flight and, in less than a century, you go from riding bicycles to taking off at Kitty Hawk to landing on the moon. But you still have to pay attention to the physical principles of what’s actually going on to make any of it work.
Although there have been setbacks over the past 226 years since Edward Jenner first used pus from cowpox lesions as his first successful vaccine against smallpox, most of those setbacks have had nothing to do with the basic concept of vaccine immunology, and the track record of pathogen protein vaccines, whether viral or bacterial, has been one of overwhelming success.
And that success boils down to two things: What we vaccines do and what we don’t do.
A. What viral protein vaccines do: We viral protein vaccines are successful to the degree that we are able to stimulate the production of a great enough quantity and broad enough variety of T cells and specific antibodies both to bind to and disable surface proteins the pathogens use to gain access to cells for replication and to tag the rest for attack, destruction, and disposal. So we can be considered successful for the harm we forestall.
B. What viral protein vaccines don’t do: We viral protein vaccines are considered successful to the degree that neither our viral protein fragments nor our other constituents harm host cells or impair biological processes required for health. We can be considered successful for the harm we do NOT do.
But, sometimes, like in most of life, results are mixed and come down to a cost/benefit analysis: if the benefits conferred significantly outweigh the harm caused or if the returns on investment significantly outweigh the costs incurred, then the overall results may be considered as a qualified success.
And that’s a judgment call that does not take place at the cellular level.
It’s a judgement call that is generally acknowledged among rational adults to be decided by those who may have to bear the costs, not those who stand to gain something by the costs borne by others.
Sometimes it may be necessary to lose a body part for your greater good if the loss is a diseased gall bladder or appendix and the greater good is your life. This makes sense even if you’re a rat caught in a trap and you have to gnaw your leg off to get away.
Or you may be willing to put up with some anal leakage caused by a drug, if the alternative of not using it is blindness.
However, trying to avoid putting on a few extra pounds from fat calories is not worth dropping a load in your pants. Same for trying to avoid anxiety, even if the product also results in your just not giving a shit when you actually drop a Sloppy Joe in your shorts, unless the product is Lomotil and, then, you literally won’t give a shit, which really will alleviate anxiety.
But going through all that in exchange for an outcome that, at best, is only a reduction in the severity of symptoms of a generally innocuous common cold and for no demonstrated statistically-significant reduction in risk of death while still suffering innate immune inflammatory attacks to destroy those cells and the resultant impairment of tissue or organ-specific function, possibly ending in death?
Or consenting, because it’s WAY cheaper for the manufacturers, to permit your healthy cells in multiple organ systems be deliberately infected with Covid-19 viral mRNA with the unavoidable immunological consequence of innate immune inflammatory attack to destroy those cells and the resultant impairment of tissue or organ-specific function, possibly ending in death?
If so, then that means one of two things, either
A. The customers who canned Olestra because they didn’t like shitting themselves, not even a little, in exchange for a crispy taste treat, have, with respect to the viral mRNA products, somehow undergone a serious impairment of judgment about matters involving self-preservation, or
B. Those selling the viral mRNA products have gone to extraordinary lengths to conceal the nature and extent of the costs to the customers while relentlessly hyping the dangers of refusing to use their products and overselling the benefits of using them.
As for us, the viral protein vaccines in use now for well over a century, one thing we do NOT do is to make your cells look virally compromised and hit the kill switch to signal the innate immune to attack and kill them.
Instead, we give protection without infection.
Neither of those is true about viral mRNA products.
Their makers have been exploiting your trust in us to hawk their products as vaccines while harming our brand by their products’ effects on you.
___________
Something that Mr. Virus did not mention about the viral RNA products
That is what happens when they’re used again.
The pernicious quality of that outcome has to do with
A. their products’ primary mechanism of action,
B. the extent of their products’ effects, and
C. the degree of their inevitable and unavoidable stimulation of innate immune response, long before any presumed adaptive immune benefit can show up, not that it would do you any good in this situation.
As Mr. Virus correctly pointed out, the degree of innate immune response is tied directly to the number and location of infected cells. This is the case regardless of whether they are infected by means of viruses or by means of the viral mRNA pseudo viruses.
The danger posed by the viral mRNA pseudo viruses is two-fold:
1. Compared to the native Covid-19 virus, it’s much greater due to the viral mRNA products’ much more widespread distribution throughout multiple organ systems.
2. Compared to the native Covid-19 virus, it’s much more intense due to lack of any early warning because the viral mRNA products are not detected until after they’ve safely made it to port inside a cell.
As I’ve previously mentioned (and hope that you remember that I did), the innate immune system, by means of its defense-in-depth strategy, can apportion its degree of response to match the extent of infection in order to prevent escalation of both the infection as well as the severity of the immune response necessary to deal with it. That’s to keep you from damaging yourself in your attempt at keeping the viruses from damaging you.
But when viral mRNA products compromise your cells and the tissues containing them throughout your body, all that measured response to an initial infection limited in extent and intensity is skipped because, although those products are designed to ACT like viruses, they are not made to LOOK like viruses.
So, as Mr. Virus correctly pointed out, because of the suddenness and extent of the signaling to the innate immune system, this primary mechanism of reaction results in a much more robust and damaging immune inflammatory response.
And even if you survive that, there is still the question of what will happen the next time.
No, not the next time if you should suffer an infection from the actual virus.
If you do suffer that, that location will be limited in location and number as always, and any specific antibodies or T cells in the vicinity will work with the innate immune system in the defense-in-depth strategy, and usually much quicker because the antibody-tagged viruses will be sequestered and destroyed while the innate immune system is in the more limited of its defense-in-depth modes.
In an initial localized infection by a novel virus, and in the absence of specific antibodies and T cells, in addition to the warning generated by cells by the appearance of viral mRNA and viral protein after the initial invasion and infection of the first batch of healthy cells, the innate immune system has its normal strategies of detecting second generation viruses on their way to invade more cells.
In an initial localized infection by a virus against which the adaptive immune system has already been trained, the presence of antibodies tagging the viruses and T cells attacking them makes the work of the innate immune system much easier and much more rapid.
But it’s a different story when the viral mRNA products are used for a second time:
Like the first time, and unlike a natural viral invasion, the viral mRNA products invade healthy cells throughout multiple organ systems.
Like the first time, and unlike a natural viral invasion (well, except for Oxford University’s AstraZeneca chimp cold virus, which was chosen because it was so good at flying in under the human innate immune system radar), the innate immune system, by having to wait for the appearance and detection of both viral mRNA and viral protein in the host cells, will still take a while to catch on that many cells appear to be in viral replication mode and in numbers and distribution indicative of a serious viral infection.
The circulating antibodies and T cells that were initiated to bind to either the surface coat proteins of the actual C-19 virus or to that single viral protein generated from the viral mRNA product’s viral gene initially won’t spot a thing in the second dose of a viral mRNA product because
A. there is nothing in the viral mRNA products that the adaptive immune system have been trained to spot. And even if they were capable of spotting naked viral mRNA, in the product’s delivery vehicle, it’s out of sight,
B. once the delivery vehicle and its contents are sequestered inside the compromised cells, the viral mRNA is still invisible to specific antibodies and T cells outside the compromised cell, and
C. after the viral protein is manufactured inside the product-compromised cell, neither specific antibodies nor T cells can bind to the viral protein a long as it’s sheltered inside the product-compromised cells.
But as soon as one of those cells becomes lysed or displays viral protein on the outside the cell membrane, such as during the formation of multi-nucleated giant cells from surrounding cells by the action of viral spike proteins in the compromised cell, then those antibodies and T cells can get into action.
When that happens, the innate immune system, in addition to having just started to get signals from cytosolic sensors inside product-compromised cells, is getting separate sets of cues from the actions of T cells and specific antibody binding, all of which indicate, not a minor border incursion that is relatively quickly and easily dealt with, but a seriously advanced viral infection compromising cells across a broad, multi-system area.
Now, instead of a stepwise increase in activity from much lower levels in a limited area of engagement against viral numbers consistent with a time point early in the infection cycle, the innate immune system is suddenly getting triggered by multiple inputs all signaling extreme danger.
The result?
The innate immune system has to exchange sniper action and hand-to-hand combat for carpet bombing, meaning even more of the high end innate immune inflammatory response. This could be described as the totally ape-shit DEFCON 5 response.
And then, when the destruction of product-compromised cells commences and the viral antigens from those cells flood the extracellular fluid compartment, the increased levels of T cell activity and vastly increased numbers of antigens being tagged by specific antibodies will also feed back into the innate immune system’s high end response.
Why?
Because multiple overlapping signals about serious levels of cellular compromise are all adding their “make it happen” for innate immune inflammatory response that is rapidly escalating in the direction of tissue-damaging levels.
Now when all this is happening as the result of a widely disseminated viral infection, there’s an actual point to it.
Why?
Because those actual viruses can be tagged, inactivated, and destroyed by the combined effort of the innate and adaptive immune responses anywhere throughout the entire time course of the infection.
Because, when all indications are that the host has suddenly and mysteriously been broadly compromised by a serious viral infection of multiple organ systems critical to survival, the immunological presumption is that it’s better to go nuclear with the possibility of surviving than to go all daisies and kumbaya with the near certainty of dying.
With the viral mRNA products there was never any danger of gravid cells on the verge of unleashing hordes of new viruses, but they just look like that to the innate immune system by virtue of the presence of viral mRNA and viral protein in them.
But this time, as a result of the first shot or even the result of an actual Covid-19 infection, the antibodies and T cells specific to that single protein are in the near vicinity and ready to get into action as soon as the viral proteins make their appearance in the extracellular fluid compartment.
At least with the actual Covid-19 infection, the initial stage of infection is still limited to ACE2-expressing cells in the respiratory tract.
But that’s not so for cells compromised by any of the viral mRNA products.
The viral proteins can be released from those cells by programmed cell-death, that is, apoptosis of the damaged cells containing them, or by the cells just being killed as a result of their cellular processes being disrupted by being too packed with viral protein, or by T cell attack triggered by the viral protein detected in the membrane of giant multi-nucleated cells.
The reaction will be much more severe than ANYTHING encountered in the course of a normal infection by the C-19 respiratory virus.
The manufacturers say, “Yeah, well, that’s how boosters work.”
Except they’re wrong.
Vaccine boosters never work that way.
Why?
Because those of us who are actual viral protein vaccine boosters do NOT invade healthy cells like viruses or viral mRNA products.
We do NOT infect healthy cells with viral mRNA like viruses or viral mRNA products.
We do NOT disrupt normal cell and tissue function like viruses or viral mRNA products.
We do NOT disrupt cell identify like viruses or viral mRNA products.
We do NOT provoke a killing attack on those poor compromised cells like viruses or viral mRNA products do.
And, unlike most viruses under initial conditions (though this is exactly what the viral mRNA products were designed to do), we do NOT cause the innate immune system to tag team with the initiated adaptive immune system members to escalate a whole body attack on the tissues and organs most critical for survival in a last ditch effort to deliver them from what appears to be viral destruction.
But the viral mRNA products skip directly to the most serious part of viral infection, replication phase, and in the most serious way, the appearance of viral replication going on simultaneously in multiple organ systems throughout the body.
______________
The ever-expanding absurdity of the whole operation that set all this into motion
1. It was utterly unnecessary,
2. It has caused far more trouble over a much greater range of people than the native virus could ever have accomplished on its own,
3. It’s being used to expand the reach of Covid, Inc. farther and farther into the same compromised population at increasingly younger ages and for other diseases.
4. It’s deliberately being used by Covid, Inc. to promote its own use.
How so? Like this:
Within 10 days after the second shot the immune reaction is generally much more severe.
And, coincidentally, over 90% of people said to be suffering “breakthrough” C-19 cases had received a viral mRNA shot within the previous 10 days.
Well, surprise, surprise, surprise.
And the people who die within the first two weeks of receiving a viral mRNA product?
They get classified as Covid-19 deaths.
Oh, gee, look.
A. Not only are the companies of Covid Inc hawking their products as vaccines promising to reduce the recipients’ chance of death by Covid-19, but
B. “breakthrough Covid-19 cases are either simply the effects of the viral mRNA products being described as Covid-19 or the recipients of the viral mRNA products being made more susceptible to infection by Covid-19,
C. the deaths caused by the viral mRNA products over the first two weeks post-injection are being classified by Covid Inc as deaths due to Covid-19.
So the companies of Covid Inc use A-C to pad the numbers of Covid-19 infections in order to hype what the companies claim is the need to be injected with their products and to scare more people into being shot up with more of their products.
From our point of view as viral protein vaccines incapable, because we infect nothing, of either B or C, this opportunistic use of the adverse outcomes of their own products to encourage people to use their products is the immunological equivalent of salting the mine.
Sure, whether due to a natural infection by Covid-19 of ACE2-expressing cells in the respiratory tract or to the viral mRNA products infecting those cells and everything else, the presence of Covid-19 mRNA and Covid-19 viral protein in formerly-healthy cells is responsible for a signal sent to the innate immune system but the MEANS by which the viral mRNA product got there was a direct consequence of the shot of products designed to behave like silent viruses hitting healthy cells throughout multiple organ systems without detection.
And for anyone disagreeing, we direct your attention to the AstraZeneca viral mRNA product that uses a chimpanzee cold virus to deliver the Covid-19 viral mRNA into healthy cells. All the other companies just use their own versions of other cell transfection reagents to do exactly the same thing.
So, in the words of Ricky Gervais, “Shut up. You know it’s true!”
______________
A Final Side-by-Side of the Three Main Players
So, I think it’s worthwhile at this point to do a side by side comparison of the three, if for no other reason that to prepare you for what the viral mRNA product will say in Part III:
A. Actual Covid-19 viruses:
They infect in a limited area (the respiratory tract).
They infect to a limited extent (only cells containing the ACE2 cell-surface receptor).
They infect in a limited manner (the infection being detected in at least two different ways from the earliest points of infection, whether by the infected cells sensing the viral mRNA and viral protein or by the innate immune system encountering viral proteins in the extracellular fluid compartment).
They are seriously compromised in about 60% of the population by previous infections by other members of the Coronavirus family.
B. Viral protein vaccines:
They infect nothing at all.
They only give the appearance from the earliest point of their injection, of having done so.
They do so in only a single manner, the detection by the innate immune system of bits and pieces of viral proteins in the extracellular fluid compartment.
If one is part of the 60% of the population with existing resistance to members of the Coronavirus family, then one already has adaptive immune protection and the viral protein vaccine will work simply as a booster of preexisting adaptive immunity.
C. The viral mRNA products
They infect cells over a broad area comprising many different organ systems.
They give no warning at all before infecting those cells because they are designed to be invisible to the innate immune system.
Once those cells are infected and before any adaptive immune responses can do anything, those infected cells throughout a broad area and in multiple organ systems are generating signals for the innate immune system to launch high level innate immune inflammatory attacks against those organ systems.
Once very large amounts of viral spike protein are released, that serves as a second instigator of serious innate immune inflammatory attacks over an equally broad area.
So, on the one hand, we viral protein vaccines only give the appearance of an infection, don’t attack healthy cells, and provide a good adaptive immune response.
The viral mRNA products pretend to be nothing more serious than viral protein vaccines, they infect a very broad array of cells with viral mRNA, and they provoke levels of innate and adaptive immune response that are much more widespread and damaging than the typical Covid-19 virus infection.
__________
Final Conclusion: We Have Met the Enemy and He Is YOU
Like Mr. Virus said, you humans have a serious enemy, but it’s not viruses and it’s not us, the viral protein vaccines.
Like Mr. Virus said, take a look in the mirror.
Both of us have seen the enemy and they are members of your own species using you guys as free bioreactors, wholly at your expense, and for their own fun and profit.
Do you want to protect your lives and everybody and everything that depends on you staying alive ?
Then you have to eradicate that disease vector. But that’s something you have to do up on your level, not down here where they are attacking you.
I warn you in advance about the remarks of the viral mRNA product spokesman. He’s seriously like Obama and the SEIU were in 2008 when they thought they had finally seized power for generations.
Let him think you’re scared and hopeless and then whack every aspect of the international criminal enterprise of Covid Inc. Without them, he and the rest of his products can’t exist.
Better late than after many more iterations of the same viral mRNA primary mechanism of action on an increasingly-compromised population consisting of over two-thirds of the entire human race.
___________
Next up: “The C19 Viral mRNA Product Defends Itself”
Or
“I’m an Artificial Virus but I Identify as a Vaccine”
Or
“How Can I Be a Vaccine When I Have Infected More Organs of More People with Covid-19 RNA in a Shorter Amount of Time, with More Severe Outcomes, and with Greater Degree of Impunity than Any Covid-19 Virus Ever Has or Ever Will?”
Or
“Saying One Thing but Doing Another: The C19 Viral RNA Product—A Killer Being Marketed as Savior, the Pharmacological Transubstantiation of Covid, Inc—Another Killer Promoting Itself as Savior”
Or
“A Medically Schizophrenic Agent in the Hands of a Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy Death Cult”
_____________
Photo by me
I wish I could bring myself to believe the Covid Inc forgot something or did not know something. I can’t. I have a few Jesuits in my family. Unfortunately… From my studies of history, I know what they are capable of… The chief sorcerers/Jesuits: Fauci and Collins knew precisely what they were doing and for what purpose. Are they human entities? I seriously doubt. “By the fruit you will know them.”